Forensic Accounting & Investigations
Financial Crime & Regulatory Exposure
3 Risk Briefings in this sub-grouping. Each is researched against current, verifiable sources, scoped to your country and industry, and delivered within 4 hours.
Money-laundering exposure is no longer confined to regulated financial institutions: art dealers, real-estate agents, professional-services firms and sectors handling significant cash now face equivalent expectations, and the personal-liability regimes for senior officers have tightened materially. This report sets out the money-laundering framework in your chosen jurisdiction and industry: the AML regime (FATF-aligned framework, local statutes, sector-specific rules), the customer-due-diligence and beneficial-ownership obligations, the suspicious-activity-reporting standards, and the recent enforcement posture. It documents the scenarios that have produced enforcement (correspondent-banking failures, real-estate transactions, professional-services facilitation), the warning indicators, the financial and personal-liability impact ranges, and the AML programme framework, with explicit triggers for engaging AML counsel.
Sanctions enforcement has become aggressively extraterritorial and unpredictable, with overlapping US, UK, EU and UN regimes that can criminalise the same transaction differently depending on which side of an opaque political situation it sits on. This report sets out the sanctions-risk framework in your chosen jurisdiction and industry: the prevailing sanctions regimes you are exposed to, the screening and licensing expectations, the secondary-sanctions reach (especially OFAC), the disgorgement and penalty exposure, and the personal-liability regime for senior officers. It documents the scenarios that have produced enforcement (Russia-Ukraine sanctions, Iran exposure, sanctioned-individual transactions, dual-use export controls), the warning indicators in your screening practice, the impact ranges, and the compliance framework, with guidance on when to engage sanctions counsel.
The line between aggressive tax planning and tax evasion has narrowed significantly under the OECD BEPS framework, the EU's DAC and equivalent national regimes, with structures that were defensible a decade ago now triggering criminal-referral exposure or facilitation-of-tax-evasion prosecutions. This report sets out the tax-risk framework in your chosen jurisdiction and industry: the prevailing regulatory and prosecutor posture, the disclosure and reportable-transaction regimes, the substance-over-form tests, and the personal-liability exposure for advisers and senior officers. It documents the scenarios that have produced enforcement or restatement (transfer-pricing failures, aggressive treaty-shopping, GAAR challenges, criminal facilitation cases), the warning indicators, the impact ranges, and the governance framework, with triggers for engaging tax counsel.
Other sub-groupings in Forensic Accounting & Investigations
Reference material for informed readers, not professional advice. Reports are produced against current, verifiable sources; material claims are referenced. Always consult a qualified adviser before acting on the contents of a report.